Prediction of Nerman Fatic [352nd] vs Gerardo Lopez Villasenor [843rd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W W W W L W
Form
L L L L L L L L W LHead-To-Head: Fatic 1 - 0 Villasenor
They have played 2 sets in total, with Fatic winning 2 and Villasenor winning 0. The last match between Fatic and Villasenor was at the Davis Cup, Group I, 1R, BIH-MEX 3-1, 16-09-2022, Rubber 1, Clay with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nerman Fatic | 1 |
| Gerardo Lopez Villasenor | 0 |
| Fatic | Stats | Villasenor |
|---|---|---|
| 88% (15-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 352 | Ranking | 843 |
| 191 | Highest Rank | 505 |
| 30 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 11 | Titles | 3 |
| 58% (372-271) | Career Total W/L | 55% (110-89) |
| $73,995 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Fatic VS Villasenor H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Nerman Fatic
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
15
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
Fatic VS Villasenor H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 15 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:24:0 | Average Match Time | 1:24:0 |
| 71% (42/59) | 1st Serve % | 68% (36/53) |
| 79% (33/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (24/36) |
| 71% (12/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (10/17) |
| 40% (2/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/4) |
| 36% (19/53) | Return Points Win % | 24% (14/59) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nerman Fatic vs Gerardo Lopez Villasenor Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 0 Villasenor
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 42.21% of points on their second serve, while Villasenor has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 46.92% of their opponent's second serve points, while Villasenor has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.39% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 43.43% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Villasenor has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 62.75% of matches played (W/L 32/ 19), with Villasenor winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 312/ 205), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Villasenor has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 88% of matches (W/L 22/ 3), where as Villasenor has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fatic winning 1 times and Villasenor being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fatic winning 2 and Villasenor winning 0. The last match between Fatic and Villasenor was at the Davis Cup, Group I, 1R, BIH-MEX 3-1, 16-09-2022, Rubber 1, Clay with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:24:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Villasenor have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fatic winning 0 times and Villasenor 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 0, and Villasenor 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 264.06 while Villasenor has played against players with an average rank of 343.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Villasenor has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 40% of breakpoint opportunities, and Villasenor has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Aljaz Jeran
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Nerman Fatic
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
16 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Timofey Skatov
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Sandro Kopp
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Mili Poljicak
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Jan Kupcic
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Nemanja Malesevic
40%
(
4 of
10)
1st Serve %
73%
(
16 of
22)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
19
Total Points Won
13
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Ante Petar Ercegovic
48%
(
14 of
29)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
100%
(
14 of
14)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Nerman Fatic
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Sebastian Gomez
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
Player
Manuel Sanchez
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
68 of
100)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
22 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
15
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ishaan Ravichander
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
63%
(
66 of
105)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
74)
88
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
46%
(
18 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matias Franco Descotte
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
102)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
53 of
66)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
26 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Bertran
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
7
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Fatic vs Villasenor?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Fatic Vs Villasenor is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (372/271) | Win/Loss | 55% (110/89) |
| 57% (824/619) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (249/202) |
| 53% (7041/6262) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2165/2038) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1416 | Aces Total | 413 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1421 | Total Double Faults | 328 |
| 1:18:22 | Average Match Time | 1:16:45 |
| 223.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 254.31 |
| 67% (21779/32637) | 1st Serve % | 65% (6335/9739) |
| 65% (14196/21779) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (4189/6335) |
| 48% (5177/10858) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1705/3404) |
| 47% (1805/3838) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (396/925) |
| 43% (14251/32900) | Return Points Win % | 39% (3754/9685) |
| 59% (363/617) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (109/193) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 51% (73/143) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 61% (33/54) |
| 53% (93/177) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (27/56) |
| 88% (366/322) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (117/98) |
| 11% (366/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (117/18) |
| 18% (277/51) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (82/12) |
See recent tennis photos of Fatic and Villasenor
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nerman Fatic
View full predicted draw for Fatic
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
